From: "Siluvery, Arun" <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: "Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: WAs in init_clock_gating?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:43:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D0E33F.4090705@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uGW3hOfe+KMtN7WCPUyRPqTZi3VYBBgB0x3vOFxmD7tZw@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/07/2014 22:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
>> I don't think it's unreasonable to use a macro that checks a global
>> list for whether to apply a given WA. They'll be scattered all over,
>> but at least it'll be easy to see:
>> 1) whether we implement a given workaround
>> and
>> 2) which platforms & steppings it applies to based on the table.
>
> Oh, I agree it's not unreasonable. But I'm kinda begging for the
> simple solution since months (years?) and haven't gotten it, while
> still getting a steady stream of bug reports and issues. So I've
> readjusted my expectations ;-)
>
> If someone delivers the real deal I'll certainly won't reject it.
> -Daniel
>
I am moving bdw workarounds from clock_gating fn to render ring init fn
and testing this before and after gpu reset.
One of the workaround is to disable STC optimization, reg CACHE_MODE_1
bit6 set to 1. I observed that some times after boot this gets reset to
0 (default value) even after applying workarounds; other than
workarounds no one else seems to write to this function.
Any ideas about this behaviour?
regards
Arun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 16:51 WAs in init_clock_gating? Mateo Lozano, Oscar
2014-07-07 20:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-07 21:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-07-07 21:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 10:43 ` Siluvery, Arun [this message]
2014-07-24 12:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 12:41 ` Siluvery, Arun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D0E33F.4090705@linux.intel.com \
--to=arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.