Re: [PATCH] shadow-securetty: add freescale lpuart

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 07/24/2014 07:03 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> We should probably be setting up the securetty file in a machine
> specific way.
>
> Doing it generically just pollutes the file with more stuff a specific
> user won't want.
>
> (Note, you aren't the first to do this.. so right now it's probably the
> best answer, but we should fix this in the future.)
>

Mark,

can you please file a bug to track this, I will mark it as an unassigned 
future / low for someone to pick up.

Sau!

> --Mark
>
> On 7/24/14, 2:44 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> Add Freescale lpuart tty's (ttyLPx) to securetty. Freescale Vybrid
>> devices running upstream kernel use this driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
>> ---
>>   meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/securetty | 8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/securetty
>> b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/securetty
>> index 0b1629f..d919993 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/securetty
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/shadow/files/securetty
>> @@ -137,6 +137,14 @@ ttymxc3
>>   ttymxc4
>>   ttymxc5
>>
>> +# Freescale lpuart ports
>> +ttyLP0
>> +ttyLP1
>> +ttyLP2
>> +ttyLP3
>> +ttyLP4
>> +ttyLP5
>> +
>>   # Standard serial ports, with devfs
>>   tts/0
>>   tts/1
>>
>