From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f8+0t9WMnGUn1NZil8+XkUjvXd0YYgoDarMcD7sa8b8=; b=rEAisHiDVZG9VtsfN+7480d1H2UIbh9oWWB/7lAVJbr1skSzJ9y96CtZHqxoYVfkqj Qa2K+S/lWI0kQBiNFBXFfQSqYjLa/zEWwoxBLlIPVHbozIqpbS/CUojNcA54hLIQYVbD SFNx2leWdB/gtJkgNMOvXfUdsBVKouOJRdfiQdhgsXWURR3sSs/uJYcyPyFwGs/4JB5m kLAR0hAZz44I6Np5V4JBKFf7hxfeuAFaIcjbDPOrcLJlG9Z3J7FzrxCJx8akBHwEocnK ROOH+Cl0StK5IZbCzvuL9yVx61KSt86461tKMMJcz44W2TMCWlzAM6ko0q1lvesKbmvH y+OA== Message-ID: <53D3D042.7030104@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:58:58 +0200 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <53CFCE94.8060605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] SLP (Service Location Protocol) List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ira McDonald , Michael Sweet Cc: "printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Pete Zannucci On 07/24/2014 04:10 AM, Ira McDonald wrote: > Hi Mike, > O f course, you're right that DNS-SD won't wake up printers. > > I agree that SLP without a DA shouldn't be used automatically. > It would wake up printers. > > But the whole idea is a spectrum of printer discovery: > a) DNS-SD; > b) SLP to a DA - found via DHCP option (RFC 2610) or SLP DA > broadcast advertising; > c) LDAP w/ Printer Schema, (RFC 3712). > > If this doesn't work well in home networks, well it doesn't. Then > you just use DNS-SD/Bonjour and live with the modest number > of discovered capabilities before direct contact with the Printer > during the Print client dialogue. Can it be that SLP got obsolete? I have looked into how to get SLP working under Ubuntu and when installing the SLP daemon (package "slpd") I ran into the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openslp-dfsg/+bug/1047561 It seems that in both Debian and Ubuntu SLP is unmaintained. The Debian package is orphaned (has no official maintainer) and not touched for two and a half years. Ubuntu simply auto-syncs the package from Debian, no one actually working on this package. The bug report is probably read only by the people who are suffering the problem, not by anyone who is supposed to fix the bug. So this gives me the impression that for nearly no one SLP is missing, and so that SLP is perhjaps obsolete. Till