From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: riel@redhat.com (Rik van Riel) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:52:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity In-Reply-To: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> References: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Message-ID: <53D69BE2.9010605@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/28/2014 01:51 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > The usage_avg_contrib is based on the current implementation of > the load avg tracking. I also have a version of the > usage_avg_contrib that is based on the new implementation [3] but > haven't provide the patches and results as [3] is still under > review. I can provide change above [3] to change how > usage_avg_contrib is computed and adapt to new mecanism. > > TODO: manage conflict with the next version of [4] FWIW, your series makes sense to me, and only the first hunk of patch 8/12 looks like it would conflict with my patches, in that your patch changes code that will only be reached in exceptional circumstances. - -- All rights reversed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT1pviAAoJEM553pKExN6D4IoH/3Ou8H8kM5zhgDc4sDY5h+0F qFDZIwdCWtKL36QfuZXIS/SXzikzs8XjxG7PIDj/sIEcpzs5jzGvlqAr/nTbQGlo 2ONnXobwSYSPbf8tEKrX4sdPS4YH1sd8+DgHC9TdYOgnWhdjpvfrwA9vFHmsZZvC SxlLKCwqdWgtQPCJiGGJGdQOaB+OsNAJcoyo8OyokdOUrpMX30bfLT+8TiAiB/zS uKrjzj3yZbrd/CRgpTSYopZgtzxHciZLLuIAurw7BJrUPL8Q1SL1HQ5eC5q/eS07 hXJrD6/o2DDfWoyeT2eDdJ9QkZKxT3vDKqC4WyVYn/2JZMzD5C+PY3XmQk7uYbU= =zV+U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751389AbaG1Sxf (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:53:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6197 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750883AbaG1Sxb (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:53:31 -0400 Message-ID: <53D69BE2.9010605@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:52:18 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vincent Guittot , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org CC: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, efault@gmx.de, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity References: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1406569906-9763-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/28/2014 01:51 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > The usage_avg_contrib is based on the current implementation of > the load avg tracking. I also have a version of the > usage_avg_contrib that is based on the new implementation [3] but > haven't provide the patches and results as [3] is still under > review. I can provide change above [3] to change how > usage_avg_contrib is computed and adapt to new mecanism. > > TODO: manage conflict with the next version of [4] FWIW, your series makes sense to me, and only the first hunk of patch 8/12 looks like it would conflict with my patches, in that your patch changes code that will only be reached in exceptional circumstances. - -- All rights reversed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT1pviAAoJEM553pKExN6D4IoH/3Ou8H8kM5zhgDc4sDY5h+0F qFDZIwdCWtKL36QfuZXIS/SXzikzs8XjxG7PIDj/sIEcpzs5jzGvlqAr/nTbQGlo 2ONnXobwSYSPbf8tEKrX4sdPS4YH1sd8+DgHC9TdYOgnWhdjpvfrwA9vFHmsZZvC SxlLKCwqdWgtQPCJiGGJGdQOaB+OsNAJcoyo8OyokdOUrpMX30bfLT+8TiAiB/zS uKrjzj3yZbrd/CRgpTSYopZgtzxHciZLLuIAurw7BJrUPL8Q1SL1HQ5eC5q/eS07 hXJrD6/o2DDfWoyeT2eDdJ9QkZKxT3vDKqC4WyVYn/2JZMzD5C+PY3XmQk7uYbU= =zV+U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----