From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:34:54 -0700 Message-ID: <53D6DE1E.1060501@zytor.com> References: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kees Cook Cc: Andy Lutomirski , linux-arch , Linux MIPS Mailing List , Will Drewry , "x86@kernel.org" , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , linux-security-module , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Alexei Starovoitov List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 07/28/2014 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath >>> >>> hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? >>> >> >> I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most >> sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? > > Since the x86 parts depend on the seccomp parts, I'm happy if you > carry them instead of having them land from my tree. Otherwise I'm > open to how to coordinate timing. > You mean for me to carry the seccomp part as well? -hpa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:34:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes In-Reply-To: References: <53D68F91.4000106@zytor.com> Message-ID: <53D6DE1E.1060501@zytor.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/28/2014 04:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 07/23/2014 12:20 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> It looks like patches 1-4 have landed here: >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=seccomp/fastpath >>> >>> hpa, what's the route forward for the x86 part? >>> >> >> I guess I should discuss this with Kees to figure out what makes most >> sense. In the meantime, could you address Oleg's question? > > Since the x86 parts depend on the seccomp parts, I'm happy if you > carry them instead of having them land from my tree. Otherwise I'm > open to how to coordinate timing. > You mean for me to carry the seccomp part as well? -hpa