From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F06708B3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6T0rK2O021095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.159] (128.224.162.159) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:53:19 -0700 Message-ID: <53D6F081.5080200@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:53:21 +0800 From: Rongqing Li User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <1406545263-7393-1-git-send-email-rongqing.li@windriver.com> <53D6EC88.1000001@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] gmp: redefine a function X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:53:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/29/2014 08:43 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Rongqing Li wrote: >> >> >> On 07/29/2014 01:25 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:01 AM, wrote: >>>> >>>> +[PATCH] reimplement umul_ppmm to make it be able to building on mips64 >>>> 64bit ABI >>>> + >>>> +Upstream-Status: Pending[This version was not maintained by upstream, >>>> larger versions have been fixed] >>>> + >>> >>> >>> if you mean newer release have been fixed then this patch should be >>> marked 'Backport' >>> >> >> >> newer releases are GPLv3, we can not backport patch from them > > I see. So you did a clean room implementation then ? if not then > you could request the original patch author to release it under GPLv2 > license for back portability > Ok, I will ask; But If the author do not like to release it under GPLv2, what should I do? -Roy >> >> -R >> >>> >> >> -- >> Best Reagrds, >> Roy | RongQing Li > > -- Best Reagrds, Roy | RongQing Li