From: Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Anthony Wright <anthony@overnetdata.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: xen 4.4.0 dependency lzo fails to build from source due to fPIC
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:21:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D8024C.3050504@terremark.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D75F700200007800027174@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 07/29/14 02:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 28.07.14 at 23:02, <anthony@overnetdata.com> wrote:
>> If xen detects lzo, it tries to build tools/xclib/libxenguest.so.4.4.0
>> with lzo support but fails with the error:
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld:
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2/../../../../lib64/liblzo2.a(lzo_ini
>> t.o):
>> relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol '_lzo_config_check' can not be
>> used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
>>
>> reading around the subject it would seem to be a problem with the lzo
>> library (2.08) which has been built without using the -fPIC option.
>> However, when I look at the lzo package there is no standard way to
>> build it with -fPIC. My workaround has been simply to remove the lzo
>> package, but I'm not sure this is a good solution, and I don't
>> understand why this problem doesn't seem to have been encountered before.
>>
>> Should I be building Xen with LZO support? (does everybody else build
>> without LZO support?)
>>
>> Should I be adding fPIC to the LZO options and rebuilding LZO?
>>
>> Is there something else I'm doing wrong that is causing the problem?
This could also be "broken toolchain" as:
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1257099] [NEW]
QEMU fails to build on CentOS 5.10 with relocation
R_X86_64_PC32 error - msg#00032
On 12/14/13 15:21, Don Slutz wrote:
On 12/09/13 08:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 09/12/2013 13:47, Don Slutz ha scritto:
On 12/05/13 22:20, Don Slutz wrote:
On 12/05/13 16:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 12/06/2013 04:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
$ gcc -shared -o f.so f.c -fPIE -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccQc9els.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `f'
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
The bug is simply that "-fPIE -fPIC" counts as -fPIE rather than -fPIC:
$ gcc -S -o - f.c -fPIE |grep call
call f # PC32 relocation
$ gcc -S -o - f.c -fPIC |grep call
call f@PLT # PLT32 relocation
The easy workaround is to drop -fPIE when we're adding -fPIC.
r~
...
talks about. From QEMU configure:
# check for broken gcc and libtool in RHEL5
if test -n "$libtool" -a "$pie" != "no" ; then
cat > $TMPC <<EOF
void *f(unsigned char *buf, int len);
void *g(unsigned char *buf, int len);
void *
f(unsigned char *buf, int len)
{
return (void*)0L;
}
void *
g(unsigned char *buf, int len)
{
return f(buf, len);
}
EOF
if ! libtool_prog; then
echo "Disabling libtool due to broken toolchain support"
libtool=
fi
fi
-Don Slutz
> The expectation is that there is a shared library to link against, not
> just a static one. If you want the static-only case supported, then
> you'll need to contribute patches (and imo those should then cover
> not just lzo, but all of the compression methods other than lz4).
>
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-29 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-28 21:02 xen 4.4.0 dependency lzo fails to build from source due to fPIC Anthony Wright
2014-07-29 6:46 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-29 20:21 ` Don Slutz [this message]
2014-07-30 7:01 ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-31 1:36 ` Don Slutz
2014-08-01 11:32 ` Anthony Wright
2014-07-30 9:03 ` Anthony Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D8024C.3050504@terremark.com \
--to=dslutz@verizon.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=anthony@overnetdata.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.