From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=EBl_Kr=E4hemann?= Subject: If underloading is possible what about overloading? Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:48:36 +0200 Message-ID: <53D8BF74.5060204@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com (mail-we0-f174.google.com [74.125.82.174]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CCE26084B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:48:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x48so913555wes.19 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.55] (124-45.195-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.195.45.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gq4sm7779609wib.8.2014.07.30.02.48.46 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:48:47 -0700 (PDT) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi all, short question: If underloading is possible what about = overloading? Is nanosleep overclocking safe? regards Jo=EBl