From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: Role of PLL_ENABLE_BIT Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:25:56 +0200 Message-ID: <53DA43E4.1000007@gmail.com> References: <2111968107.110151406781109677.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas02a> <53DA1576.6020504@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:65104 "EHLO mail-wg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbaGaN0E (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:26:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id k14so2735482wgh.20 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:26:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Humberto Naves , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Cc: linux-samsung-soc , Yadwinder Singh Brar , Mike Turquette , Tomasz Figa , Vikas Sajjan , Yadwinder Singh On 31.07.2014 12:46, Humberto Naves wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I guess the original message was not plain text, and majordomo refused > to deliver it :-( > The signedness is not an issue, if I just use what I sent in the > patch, the set_rate function works like a charm. But otherwise, the > whole system freezes and I have to reboot the machine. It's possible that the bootloader simply doesn't enable the PLL. I had a patch somewhere which added enable/disable control for the PLL, which required a bit more work. It might be a good idea to revisit it then. Best regards, Tomasz