From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Nikolay Avdeev <avdeev@math.vsu.ru>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug report about symlinks
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:04:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DABD69.7010004@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-416867478@relay1.vsu.ru>
Am 31.07.2014 um 21:50 schrieb Nikolay Avdeev:
> I've noticed something strange with git status when replacing a folder with
> symlink to another folder.
> There is a git repo with script with demo in the attachment.
Let's try and make this a bit easier for folks to follow along.
# Create test repo with two directories with two files each.
$ git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/.git/
$ mkdir a b
$ echo x >a/equal
$ echo x >b/equal
$ echo y >a/different
$ echo z >b/different
$ git add a b
$ git commit -minitial
[master (root-commit) 6d36895] initial
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 a/different
create mode 100644 a/equal
create mode 100644 b/different
create mode 100644 b/equal
# Replace one directory with a symlink to the other.
$ rm -rf b
$ ln -s a b
# First git status call.
$ git status
On branch master
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
deleted: b/different
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
b
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
# Stage the changes.
$ git add b
# Second git status call.
$ git status
On branch master
Changes to be committed:
(use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
new file: b
deleted: b/different
deleted: b/equal
# Commit the staged changes.
$ git commit -msymlinked
[master 4498f28] symlinked
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 120000 b
delete mode 100644 b/different
delete mode 100644 b/equal
That the first and second status call report different results is a
feature; staging changes using git add alters the status. A commit
after the first status call would be empty.
It could be debated if the first git status call should also report
b/equal as deleted.
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 19:50 Bug report about symlinks Nikolay Avdeev
2014-07-31 22:04 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2014-08-01 16:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-02 14:10 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-03 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-03 22:59 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-04 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-09 17:43 ` [PATCH] read-cache: check for leading symlinks when refreshing index René Scharfe
2014-08-04 11:03 ` Bug report about symlinks Duy Nguyen
2014-08-04 16:36 ` Junio C Hamano
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-30 11:30 NickKolok
2014-08-01 19:10 ` Dennis Kaarsemaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53DABD69.7010004@web.de \
--to=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=avdeev@math.vsu.ru \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.