From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54572)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Joel.Schopp@amd.com>) id 1XDDxp-0001fg-57
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:37:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Joel.Schopp@amd.com>) id 1XDDxg-0002yo-L5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:37:45 -0400
Received: from mail-bn1blp0186.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([207.46.163.186]:48602
	helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Joel.Schopp@amd.com>) id 1XDDxg-0002yF-Fx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:37:36 -0400
Message-ID: <53DB9DE8.3020805@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:02:16 -0500
From: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20140723200925.9787.75225.stgit@joelaarch64.amd.com>
	<CAFEAcA_t12TF3xeEtA4N7cwN5gsCx_Cpk9N5CJ13m_UN6n0y2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<53DB7CF4.1020702@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <53DB7CF4.1020702@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm64: 64K pages and > 1024MB guest
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>


> I agree.
>
> I think the patch is right but, besides these considerations, does this
> bug still manifest itself after Andrew fixed the start address of the
> device at 0x90010000 (IIRC it was the pl031)?
The device I see with that address is:
hw/arm/virt.c:    [VIRT_RTC] = { 0x90010000, 0x1000 },

The bug still manifests itself with that in the tree (without my patch
applied).