From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C171EE007DC; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 02:21:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (www.dynamicdevices.co.uk [89.200.136.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D13E007D3 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 02:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8307E27E062; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:21:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lennoab2.miniserver.com Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.dynamicdevices.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csnsTY9fwqI8; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cpc32-live22-2-0-cust59.17-2.cable.virginm.net [82.36.253.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D5D127E060; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53DF508D.9090109@dynamicdevices.co.uk> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:21:17 +0100 From: Alex J Lennon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=E9vin_THIERRY?= , ronan References: <53DA58C9.50705@open.eurogiciel.org> <53DB6430.8090608@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <53DB660B.6040700@open.eurogiciel.org> <53DB66D8.3060500@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <53DBA085.7010705@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <53DBA665.7080002@open.eurogiciel.org> <53DBB20B.8020307@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <53DBB576.2000905@open.eurogiciel.org> <53DBB48B.2050907@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <53DBC21B.7080209@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <53DD053A.9060902@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <53DF3BD2.6000601@open.eurogiciel.org> In-Reply-To: <53DF3BD2.6000601@open.eurogiciel.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, general@lists.tizen.org Subject: Re: [Tizen General] Build Tizen with yocto work-flow X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:21:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 04/08/2014 08:52, Kévin THIERRY wrote: > > On 02/08/2014 17:35, Alex J Lennon wrote: >> On 01/08/2014 17:36, Alex J Lennon wrote: >>> On 01/08/2014 16:38, Alex J Lennon wrote: >>>>> I don't know either but I think it's best to be compliant with both >>>>> bash and dash, I will try to correct those issues in order to be >>>>> dash-compliant. Thanks a lot for the feedback ;) >>>> No problem Kévin. I'm glad you feel it is of some use. I'm getting >>>> other >>>> recipes failing now with bash. What I'll probably do is let it run to >>>> completion with bitbake -k and collate the failures. >>>> >>>> Hopefully that'll be some useful feedback in terms of a build on >>>> Ubuntu >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Alex >>>> >> Kévin, >> >> I made some progress with a USB installation of Yocto Tizen and a >> VirtualBox disk. > That's good news ! Did you have to make some changes in meta-tizen ? > If so, could you send us your patches so we can integrate them ? Thanks ! >> >> Both a Samsung laptop running from USB and a VirtualBox machine boot, >> but after mounting the root filesystem they go extremely slowly. >> >> They get to "failed to get machine ID" and then it's taking a minute >> or two before new output appears. Then screen goes black and I don't >> appear to get any further. >> >> e.g. >> https://www.dropbox.com/sc/ckc84doykfnyvwp/AAAA7s_wocGh1PNUJ3tfIMBLa?n=17361870 >> >> > We already encountered this issue in the past unfortunately we don't > know what causes that. We didn't get this issue recently so we are > unable to reproduce it. I'm wondering if it could be linked too the > use of a USB (we are not using USB anymore to test the images since > it's not very convenient). I will put an image on a USB stick and see > how it goes. > > If you have more ideas about what could cause this issue we would be > glad to know them. > > Kevin I don't think it's specifically due to USB as I was using USB for the laptop test, but I built up a VDI disk image in a VirtualBox for the VM test, so no USB there... I'm not sure why it might be I'm afraid Kevin. I started trying to follow the manual procedure to build but ran into some build errors there and ran out of time. Cheers, Alex