From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ARM: OMAP: add external clock provider support Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 14:37:56 +0300 Message-ID: <53DF7094.7050601@ti.com> References: <1406898948-26113-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:59593 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751586AbaHDLjo (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 07:39:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1406898948-26113-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tero Kristo , mturquette@linaro.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, sassmann@kpanic.de, jsarha@ti.com Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 08/01/2014 04:15 PM, Tero Kristo wrote: > Hi, >=20 > This patch adds possibility to register external clocks (outside the = main > SoC) on TI boards through device tree. Clock sources as such include = for > example twl-6030 / twl-6040 chips and variants which can be used to c= lock > for example audio / WLAN chips. Just one question to Mike and Tero: would it be possible to have generic binding for such an external clock= s? We have the palmas clock driver already upstream which handles the 32K = clocks from the PMIC. Palmas class of PMICs can be used with TI/nVidia(/Intel?= ) platforms. We use Palmas on omap5-uevm, DRA7-EVM also uses Palmas compa= tible PMIC and some nVidia platform also uses this class of devices (and they= all need to have control over the 32K clock(s)). > This patch can be queued once someone has a use-case + patches that r= equires > usage of such clocks. >=20 > -Tero >=20 --=20 P=E9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 14:37:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 0/1] ARM: OMAP: add external clock provider support In-Reply-To: <1406898948-26113-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> References: <1406898948-26113-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Message-ID: <53DF7094.7050601@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/01/2014 04:15 PM, Tero Kristo wrote: > Hi, > > This patch adds possibility to register external clocks (outside the main > SoC) on TI boards through device tree. Clock sources as such include for > example twl-6030 / twl-6040 chips and variants which can be used to clock > for example audio / WLAN chips. Just one question to Mike and Tero: would it be possible to have generic binding for such an external clocks? We have the palmas clock driver already upstream which handles the 32K clocks from the PMIC. Palmas class of PMICs can be used with TI/nVidia(/Intel?) platforms. We use Palmas on omap5-uevm, DRA7-EVM also uses Palmas compatible PMIC and some nVidia platform also uses this class of devices (and they all need to have control over the 32K clock(s)). > This patch can be queued once someone has a use-case + patches that requires > usage of such clocks. > > -Tero > -- P?ter