From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: upgrade:firefly-x:stress-split related workload Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 15:11:14 +0200 Message-ID: <53DF8672.2050109@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0svlTgNCXnaet4Be1LLijLJu33iFbudmH" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:53487 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394AbaHDNLV (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:11:21 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0svlTgNCXnaet4Be1LLijLJu33iFbudmH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yuri, FYI I scheduled a upgrade:firefly-x:stress-split to check if http://track= er.ceph.com/issues/8475#note-14 behaves as expected http://pulpito.ceph.c= om/loic-2014-08-04_15:06:02-upgrade:firefly-x:stress-split-wip-8475-testi= ng-basic-plana/=20 I'm hoping to see the same failures you have on master on next http://pul= pito.ceph.com/teuthology-2014-07-30_13:09:01-upgrade:firefly-x:stress-spl= it-next---basic-plana/ Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --0svlTgNCXnaet4Be1LLijLJu33iFbudmH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlPfhnIACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23kNQCeKEze5pnicqVREB2Lz2P2Je7r S2kAn1evjI9XZFn6roo30Mp1ABR7Hhnk =LkQd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0svlTgNCXnaet4Be1LLijLJu33iFbudmH--