From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen: Implement ioctl to restrict privcmd to a specific domain Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:45:34 +0100 Message-ID: <53E0DFFE.9090202@citrix.com> References: <201407311317.s6VDHJV9013633@aserp1020.oracle.com> <20140804202633.GC6380@laptop.dumpdata.com> <1407229819.26842.4.camel@hamster.uk.xensource.com> <20140805134220.GD13057@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140805134220.GD13057-0iZWjJA6G8GSPmnEAIUT9EEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Frediano Ziglio Cc: Boris Ostrovsky , linux-kernel , xen-devel , linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 05/08/14 14:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > - Some of these hypercalls don't have an ABI so we can't depend > on them being stable. How do you want to handle that? We are not going any further with this series because of this. David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753410AbaHENpi (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:45:38 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:36899 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256AbaHENpg (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:45:36 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,804,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="159509311" Message-ID: <53E0DFFE.9090202@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:45:34 +0100 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Frediano Ziglio CC: Boris Ostrovsky , linux-kernel , xen-devel , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen: Implement ioctl to restrict privcmd to a specific domain References: <201407311317.s6VDHJV9013633@aserp1020.oracle.com> <20140804202633.GC6380@laptop.dumpdata.com> <1407229819.26842.4.camel@hamster.uk.xensource.com> <20140805134220.GD13057@laptop.dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20140805134220.GD13057@laptop.dumpdata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/08/14 14:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > - Some of these hypercalls don't have an ABI so we can't depend > on them being stable. How do you want to handle that? We are not going any further with this series because of this. David