Re: [pull] radeon drm-next-3.17

["Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>]

Am 05.08.2014 um 19:22 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
>>> Vetter
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:09 PM
>>> To: Alex Deucher
>>> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; airlied@gmail.com; Deucher, Alexander
>>> Subject: Re: [pull] radeon drm-next-3.17
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> This is the radeon pull request for 3.17.  Highlights:
>>>> - Additional Hawaii fixes
>>>> - Support for using the display scaler on non-fixed mode displays
>>>> - Support for new firmware format that makes it easier to update
>>>> - Enable dpm by default on additional asics
>>>> - GPUVM improvements
>>>> - Support for uncached and write combined gtt buffers
>>>> - Userptr support
>>> Aside: Where's the libdrm/mesa/whatever patches for this? I didn't see
>>> them fly by anywhere, so I guess I've missed them on some m-l I don't
>>> subscribe to.
>> Christian wrote some patches to validate the interfaces, but I'm not sure he ever sent them out.  We haven't yet done a full implementation in the usermode drivers to take advantage of this yet.
> Well right now I've consistently rejected all patches that don't yet
> come with the full thing (libdrm, usermode drivers and tests for it
> all as not ready). And I do that at least once per week since we have
> blob userspace separate from mesa, too. So if we toss that rule
> overboard (and my understanding is that Dave's been fairly strict
> here) I'll look rather bad. As in really, really bad.
>
> I strongly prefer that userptr gets postponed until it's ready. Dave?

That's just my fault. Wanted to wait with the mesa patches till we have 
the kernel interface accepted.

I've just send them out,
Christian.

> -Daniel