From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c: drop stray break operator
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 07:09:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E1D497.3080309@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805.124939.1701979639778778101.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254", Size: 1945 bytes --]
Am 05.08.2014 21:49, schrieb David Miller:
> From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 09:11:52 +0200
>
>>
>>
>> Am 04.08.2014 22:47, schrieb Andrey Utkin:
>>> This commit is a guesswork, but it seems to make sense to drop this
>>> break, as otherwise the following line is never executed and becomes
>>> dead code. And that following line actually saves the result of
>>> local calculation by the pointer given in function argument. So the
>>> proposed change makes sense if this code in the whole makes sense (but I
>>> am unable to analyze it in the whole).
>>>
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id641
>>> Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> index aa4d55b..5ce8f2f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> +++ b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static int do_one_mathemu(u32 insn, unsigned long *pfsr, unsigned long *fregs)
>>> case 0: fsr = *pfsr;
>>> if (IR = -1) IR = 2;
>>> /* fcc is always fcc0 */
>>
>> The patch looks ok, but can somebody comment on this comment ?
>> what "fcc" ? should it be a fsr ?
>
> It's the condition code field inside of the %fsr register.
>
> In 32-bit chips there is only one set of condition codes, whereas
> on 64-bit chips there are 4 sets referred to as fcc0, fcc1, fcc2,
> and fcc3.
>
> That's what this comment is talking about.
>
thx for info,
would you mind to add your explanation ?
It is much mor helpful that the comment right now.
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c: drop stray break operator
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 07:09:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E1D497.3080309@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805.124939.1701979639778778101.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254", Size: 1940 bytes --]
Am 05.08.2014 21:49, schrieb David Miller:
> From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 09:11:52 +0200
>
>>
>>
>> Am 04.08.2014 22:47, schrieb Andrey Utkin:
>>> This commit is a guesswork, but it seems to make sense to drop this
>>> break, as otherwise the following line is never executed and becomes
>>> dead code. And that following line actually saves the result of
>>> local calculation by the pointer given in function argument. So the
>>> proposed change makes sense if this code in the whole makes sense (but I
>>> am unable to analyze it in the whole).
>>>
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id641
>>> Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> index aa4d55b..5ce8f2f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> +++ b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static int do_one_mathemu(u32 insn, unsigned long *pfsr, unsigned long *fregs)
>>> case 0: fsr = *pfsr;
>>> if (IR = -1) IR = 2;
>>> /* fcc is always fcc0 */
>>
>> The patch looks ok, but can somebody comment on this comment ?
>> what "fcc" ? should it be a fsr ?
>
> It's the condition code field inside of the %fsr register.
>
> In 32-bit chips there is only one set of condition codes, whereas
> on 64-bit chips there are 4 sets referred to as fcc0, fcc1, fcc2,
> and fcc3.
>
> That's what this comment is talking about.
>
thx for info,
would you mind to add your explanation ?
It is much mor helpful that the comment right now.
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c: drop stray break operator
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:09:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E1D497.3080309@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805.124939.1701979639778778101.davem@davemloft.net>
Am 05.08.2014 21:49, schrieb David Miller:
> From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 09:11:52 +0200
>
>>
>>
>> Am 04.08.2014 22:47, schrieb Andrey Utkin:
>>> This commit is a guesswork, but it seems to make sense to drop this
>>> break, as otherwise the following line is never executed and becomes
>>> dead code. And that following line actually saves the result of
>>> local calculation by the pointer given in function argument. So the
>>> proposed change makes sense if this code in the whole makes sense (but I
>>> am unable to analyze it in the whole).
>>>
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81641
>>> Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> index aa4d55b..5ce8f2f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> +++ b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c
>>> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static int do_one_mathemu(u32 insn, unsigned long *pfsr, unsigned long *fregs)
>>> case 0: fsr = *pfsr;
>>> if (IR == -1) IR = 2;
>>> /* fcc is always fcc0 */
>>
>> The patch looks ok, but can somebody comment on this comment ?
>> what "fcc" ? should it be a fsr ?
>
> It's the condition code field inside of the %fsr register.
>
> In 32-bit chips there is only one set of condition codes, whereas
> on 64-bit chips there are 4 sets referred to as fcc0, fcc1, fcc2,
> and fcc3.
>
> That's what this comment is talking about.
>
thx for info,
would you mind to add your explanation ?
It is much mor helpful that the comment right now.
re,
wh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 20:47 [PATCH] arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c: drop stray break operator Andrey Utkin
2014-08-04 20:47 ` Andrey Utkin
2014-08-04 20:47 ` Andrey Utkin
2014-08-05 3:32 ` David Miller
2014-08-05 3:32 ` David Miller
2014-08-05 3:32 ` David Miller
2014-08-05 7:11 ` walter harms
2014-08-05 7:11 ` walter harms
2014-08-05 7:11 ` walter harms
2014-08-05 19:49 ` David Miller
2014-08-05 19:49 ` David Miller
2014-08-05 19:49 ` David Miller
2014-08-06 7:09 ` walter harms [this message]
2014-08-06 7:09 ` walter harms
2014-08-06 7:09 ` walter harms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E1D497.3080309@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.