All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: BOOTP retry timeout improvements
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:58:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E25094.4010008@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406331048-27700-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>

On 07/25/2014 05:30 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> Currently, the BOOTP code sends out its initial request as soon as the
> Ethernet driver indicates "link up". If this packet is lost or not
> replied to for some reason, the code waits for a 1s timeout before
> retrying. For some reason, such early packets are often lost on my
> system, so this causes an annoying delay.
>
> To optimize this, modify the BOOTP code to have very short timeouts for
> the first packet transmitted, but gradually increase the timeout each
> time a timeout occurs. This way, if the first packet is lost, the second
> packet is transmitted quite quickly and hence the overall delay is low.
> However, if there's still no response, we don't keep spewing out packets
> at an insane speed.
>
> It's arguably more correct to try and find out why the first packet is
> lost. However, it seems to disappear inside my Ethenet chip; the TX chip
> indicates no error during TX (not that it has much in the way of
> reporting...), yet wireshark on the RX side doesn't see any packet.
> FWIW, I'm using an ASIX USB Ethernet adapter. Perhaps "link up" is
> reported too early or based on the wrong condition in HW, and we should
> add some fixed extra delay into the driver. However, this would slow down
> every link up event even if it ends up not being needed in some cases.
> Having BOOTP retry quickly applies the fix/WAR to every possible
> Ethernet device, and is quite simple to implement, so seems a better
> solution.

Joe, Tom,

Does this patch look OK?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-25 23:30 [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: BOOTP retry timeout improvements Stephen Warren
2014-08-06 15:58 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2014-08-06 18:10   ` Tom Rini
2014-08-06 20:03 ` Joe Hershberger
2014-08-10 22:22 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
2014-08-15 12:39 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Thierry Reding
2014-08-15 12:49   ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-15 16:02     ` Stephen Warren
2014-08-15 21:39       ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-15 22:09         ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-18 16:04         ` Stephen Warren
2014-08-18 16:15           ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E25094.4010008@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.