From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 5DE0AE00563; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:46:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117B3E0054C for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C72820F3488 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 17:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53E269F5.6070302@mindchasers.com> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:46:29 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Will qoriq ppc developers require meta-fsl-arm? X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:46:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Working with my own image recipe for a QorIQ PPC build using the Community & Yocto repos. I find I have some extra work to do once I include meta-fsl-demos but not meta-fsl-arm in my bblayers.conf since there are recipes inside of meta-fsl-demos that inherit classes from meta-fsl-arm (e.g., fsl-eula-unpack.bbclass). Is the plan to have ppc developers include meta-fsl-arm in their layers definition (and vice-versa)? I prefer to not do this. Thanks Bob