All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
	Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Rewrite `git_config()` using config-set API
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 19:37:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E4D986.6040708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqoavwjb3i.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On 8/8/2014 2:01 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> 
>>>> Why is this needed? Are you now using key_value_info outside config.c?
>>>> Or is it a leftover from a previous experiment?
>>>
>>> Has this been resolved in the new round?
>>
>> Tanay explained in another subthread why this was needed. For callers
>> iterating over the string_list who want to get the file/line info, they
>> need to be able to cast the void * pointer to struct key_value_info *.
> 
> For callers that want to see all the multi-values, it would be
> preferrable for the iterator to pass the filename and the linenumber
> to the callback function, instead of exposing its implementation
> detail as a single string list and telling them to pick it apart,
> no?
> 
> Not a very convincing argument, but OK for now in the sense that we
> can fix it later if we wanted to before it gets too late.
>

(cc to Ramsay)

The discussion in both threads (v8 and v9), boils down to this,
is the `key_value_info` struct really required to be declared public or should be
just an implementation detail. I will give you the context,

The usage of the above mentioned struct is only required for
git_config_get_value_multi(). With the public struct, the code flow would look
like,


-- 8< --
diff --git a/notes.c b/notes.c
index 5fe691d..b7ab115 100644
--- a/notes.c
+++ b/notes.c
@@ -961,19 +961,6 @@ void string_list_add_refs_from_colon_sep(struct string_list *list,
 	free(globs_copy);
 }

-static int notes_display_config(const char *k, const char *v, void *cb)
-{
-	int *load_refs = cb;
-
-	if (*load_refs && !strcmp(k, "notes.displayref")) {
-		if (!v)
-			config_error_nonbool(k);
-		string_list_add_refs_by_glob(&display_notes_refs, v);
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 const char *default_notes_ref(void)
 {
 	const char *notes_ref = NULL;
@@ -1041,7 +1028,9 @@ struct notes_tree **load_notes_trees(struct string_list *refs)
 void init_display_notes(struct display_notes_opt *opt)
 {
 	char *display_ref_env;
-	int load_config_refs = 0;
+	const struct string_list *values;
+	struct key_value_info *kv_info;
+	int load_config_refs = 0, i;
 	display_notes_refs.strdup_strings = 1;

 	assert(!display_notes_trees);
@@ -1058,7 +1047,21 @@ void init_display_notes(struct display_notes_opt *opt)
 			load_config_refs = 1;
 	}

-	git_config(notes_display_config, &load_config_refs);
+	if (load_config_refs) {
+		values = git_config_get_value_multi("notes.displayref");
+		if (values) {
+			for (i = 0; i < values->nr; i++) {
+				if (!values->items[i].string) {
+					kv_info = values->items[i].util;
+					config_error_nonbool("notes.displayref");
+					git_die_config_linenr("notes.displayref", kv_info->filename, kv_info->linenr);
+				}
+				else
+					string_list_add_refs_by_glob(&display_notes_refs,
+								     values->items[i].string);
+			}
+		}
+	}

 	if (opt) {
 		struct string_list_item *item;
-- 8< --

We cannot use git_die_config() here because it is applicable to the last
value for a given variable.

Alternative solution to the problem can be a helper function like this,

git_die_config_index(key, value_index, err_msg, ...) which needs the value_index for a multi valued one,

+		values = git_config_get_value_multi("notes.displayref");
+		if (values) {
+			for (i = 0; i < values->nr; i++) {
+				if (!values->items[i].string)
+					git_die_config_linenr("notes.displayref", i, "no null values allowed for :'%s'", "notes.displayref");
+				else ; /* do stuff */
+			}

A callback iterator which supplies the linenr and filename to the callback
function is not helpful, because there are many variable checks in a
git_config() call where multi valued and single valued both reside, so we cannot
use a callback iterator without adding more code cruft.

What do you think, which way seems least obtrusive, or is there an another way out?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-08 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-06 14:53 [PATCH v8 0/8] Rewrite `git_config()` using config-set API Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] config.c: mark error and warnings strings for translation Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] config.c: fix accuracy of line number in errors Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] add line number and file name info to `config_set` Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 15:49   ` Ramsay Jones
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] change `git_config()` return value to void Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] config: add `git_die_config()` to the config-set API Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] rewrite git_config() to use " Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] add a test for semantic errors in config files Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 14:53 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] add tests for `git_config_get_string_const()` Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 15:32   ` Matthieu Moy
2014-08-06 15:44     ` Tanay Abhra
2014-08-06 21:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-07  8:30       ` Matthieu Moy
2014-08-06 15:26 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] Rewrite `git_config()` using config-set API Matthieu Moy
2014-08-07 19:03   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-07 19:35     ` Matthieu Moy
2014-08-07 20:31       ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-08 14:07         ` Tanay Abhra [this message]
2014-08-08 14:32           ` Ramsay Jones
2014-08-10 17:29             ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-11  9:59               ` Ramsay Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E4D986.6040708@gmail.com \
    --to=tanayabh@gmail.com \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.