Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/17] 3.16.1-stable review

[Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>]

On 08/09/2014 09:07 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> There are two arm build failures in Linus' tree which are not seen
>> in -next.
>
> Ugh. Did I screw up the semantic merge wrt the devm_phy_create()
> argument changes despite having an example patch from Stephen? Or is
> this something else due to something that just wasn't in -next?
>
> Can you post the build failures?
>

Building arm:multi_v7_defconfig ... failed
Building arm:exynos_defconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log (same for both builds):

ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "disp_pd"

ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-arndale-octa.dtb] Error 2

and:

$ git grep disp_pd
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi:              samsung,power-domain = <&disp_pd>;

So, yes, disp_pd is not defined.

If I understand -next correctly, it includes a fixup which removes disp_pd
from the file. From the -next build log:

	Applying: ARM: dts: exynos5420: remove disp_pd

Copying Stephen for additional input.

Guenter