From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 1/3] xen-netback: move NAPI add/remove calls
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:59:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E8CC58.10904@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140811134322.GE3249@zion.uk.xensource.com>
On 11/08/14 14:43, Wei Liu wrote:
> In short, there's no need to reorder disconnect logic and no need have a
> dedicated loop for netif_napi_del.
Not for now. But I would prefer it if it was re-ordered. And similarly
in xenvif_down(), irq_disable() should be before napi_disable().
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-08 16:37 [PATCH net v2 0/3] xen-netback: synchronisation between core driver and netback Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] xen-netback: move NAPI add/remove calls Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-08-08 16:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-08-08 16:52 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:52 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 12:35 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 12:35 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-11 12:49 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 12:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 13:01 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 13:14 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 13:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 13:43 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 13:43 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2014-08-11 13:59 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-08-11 14:08 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2014-08-11 13:59 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 13:01 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-08 16:37 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] xen-netback: don't stop dealloc kthread too early Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 12:10 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 12:10 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-11 13:48 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 13:58 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 13:58 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-11 14:13 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 14:13 ` [Xen-devel] " Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-11 14:44 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2014-08-11 15:23 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 15:23 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-11 20:39 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 20:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:31 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:34 ` David Vrabel
2014-08-11 14:34 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-11 14:39 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2014-08-11 14:31 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-11 13:48 ` Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] xen-netback: remove loop waiting function Wei Liu
2014-08-08 16:37 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E8CC58.10904@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.