All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	user-mode-linux-devel
	<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	sahne@0x90.at
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] "resource: provide new functions to walk through resources" breaks UML
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:25:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E91894.3060501@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140811184401.GE1863@redhat.com>

On 08/11/2014 08:44 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Can you please give the attached patch a try and see if it fixes the UML
> issue.
> 
> I noticed that previous code had a for() loop which will not execute
> if p was null. I have resorted back to same code now. 
> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> 
> ---
>  kernel/resource.c |   11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/resource.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/resource.c	2014-08-11 13:36:19.942423192 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/resource.c	2014-08-11 13:50:20.529387653 -0400
> @@ -351,15 +351,12 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct re
>  	end = res->end;
>  	BUG_ON(start >= end);
>  
> -	read_lock(&resource_lock);
> -
> -	if (first_level_children_only) {
> -		p = iomem_resource.child;
> +	if (first_level_children_only)
>  		sibling_only = true;
> -	} else
> -		p = &iomem_resource;
>  
> -	while ((p = next_resource(p, sibling_only))) {
> +	read_lock(&resource_lock);
> +
> +	for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p, sibling_only)) {
>  		if (p->flags != res->flags)
>  			continue;
>  		if (name && strcmp(p->name, name))
> 
At least at my system (32 bit x86) the patch seems to work (applied on top of v3.16-10473-gc8d6637)

-- 
Toralf


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-11 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-10 16:56 "resource: provide new functions to walk through resources" breaks UML Richard Weinberger
2014-08-11 12:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-11 12:25   ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-11 18:44     ` [uml-devel] " Vivek Goyal
2014-08-11 18:44       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-11 19:18       ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-11 19:25       ` Toralf Förster [this message]
2014-08-11 19:48       ` Daniel Walter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E91894.3060501@gmx.de \
    --to=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sahne@0x90.at \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.