From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/14] mbuf: rename in_port to just port Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:00:55 +0200 Message-ID: <53E9D7C7.4020808@6wind.com> References: <1407789890-17355-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1407789890-17355-6-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bruce Richardson , dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1407789890-17355-6-git-send-email-bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On 08/11/2014 10:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > In some cases we may want to tag a packet for a particular destination > or output port, so rename the "in_port" field in the mbuf to just "port" > so that it can be re-used for this purpose if an application needs it. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson Acked-by: Olivier Matz