From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4F715E00799; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:24:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [207.46.163.184 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1blp0184.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.184]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7BAE006EF for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BY2PR03CA053.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.249.26) by BLUPR03MB565.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.77.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1005.10; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:24:16 +0000 Received: from BN1BFFO11FD060.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::1:125) by BY2PR03CA053.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2c5d::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1005.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:24:14 +0000 Received: from tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (192.88.168.50) by BN1BFFO11FD060.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.145.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1010.11 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:24:13 +0000 Received: from [10.29.244.85] ([10.29.244.85]) by tx30smr01.am.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id s7CFOBZe022238; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:24:12 -0700 Message-ID: <53EA2F70.10405@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:14:56 -0300 From: Angolini Daiane-b19406 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Eliotec References: <53E9F72C.6030602@freescale.com> <53EA132A.2090602@freescale.com> <53EA21FE.6000504@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:192.88.168.50; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(189002)(51704005)(24454002)(377424004)(52164004)(199003)(83072002)(92726001)(65816999)(64126003)(85852003)(31966008)(106466001)(95666004)(92566001)(33656002)(102836001)(107046002)(84676001)(105606002)(21056001)(50986999)(104016003)(74662001)(99396002)(110136001)(74502001)(76176999)(54356999)(44976005)(76482001)(6806004)(64706001)(46102001)(68736004)(93886004)(83322001)(36756003)(79102001)(65806001)(23676002)(85306004)(20776003)(65956001)(87936001)(81342001)(26826002)(4396001)(77982001)(50466002)(83506001)(81542001)(47776003)(80022001)(97736001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB565; H:tx30smr01.am.freescale.net; FPR:; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0301360BF5 Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of freescale.com does not designate 192.88.168.50 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=192.88.168.50; helo=tx30smr01.am.freescale.net; Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 192.88.168.50) smtp.mailfrom=Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com; X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: vpu on imx6 solo X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:24:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-08-2014 12:18, Pierre Eliotec wrote: > hello, > > I tried this image with the same result (Illegal instruction) > I am on daisy, I made no change on the toolchain. Compared to the > imx6solosabresd, i just changed the uart line to match my board: > SERIAL_CONSOLE = "115200 ttymxc1" I think Illegal Instruction error is more regarding binary incompatibility than IP incompatibility I mean, I would expect another kind of error in case it is a dts mismatch. > Then, I made changes in the device tree to disable all the IPs I'm not > using, enabling hdmi output only and enabling uart2. > Are the imx6solo and imx6dl VPU completely identical? The difference is number of cores and amount of RAM memory. And those are covered by the machine conf files in meta-fsl-arm However I don't have a mx6solo machine I can test, anyway Daiane