From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 5/5] xen: Handle resumed instruction
 based on previous mem_event reply
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:43:29 +0300
Message-ID: <53EA3621.7020906@bitdefender.com>
References: <1407769686-7918-1-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>	<1407769686-7918-5-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
	<53EA4CEA020000780002BB82@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <53EA4CEA020000780002BB82@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 08/12/2014 06:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 11.08.14 at 17:08, <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -1699,6 +1699,18 @@ static void vmx_enable_msr_exit_interception(struct domain *d)
>>              vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(v, msrs[i], MSR_TYPE_W);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static bool_t vmx_exited_by_nested_pagefault(void)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long exit_qualification;
>> +
>> +    __vmread(EXIT_QUALIFICATION, &exit_qualification);
>> +
>> +    if ( (exit_qualification & EPT_GLA_FAULT) == 0 )
>> +        return 0;
>> +
>> +    return 1;
>> +}
> 
> As (I think) said on the previous version already - this would apparently
> benefit from being based on Tamas's recent work (slated to go in once
> the series got suitably acked).

I agree, that would be great. In the meantime, I just thought that the
patches should be self-sufficient.


Thanks,
Razvan Cojocaru