Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] xen:x86: introduce a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>]

On 2014/8/12 20:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.08.14 at 12:55, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2014/8/8 23:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 07.08.14 at 13:02, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Returns the RMRR memory map as it was when the domain
>>>> + * was started.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define XENMEM_RMRR_memory_map           26
>>>> +typedef struct e820map rmrr_e820_t;
>>>> +DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(rmrr_e820_t);
>>>
>>> Again just as a general remark: What in the world does the "e820"
>>> in here mean?
>>
>> I will redefine a struct to represent this to avoid any confusion.
>
> And just to avoid another needless round: The term RMRR shouldn't
> be in the hypercall public interface definitions either. This needs to
> be properly abstracted.
>

Without such a term RMRR I can't figure out what definition should be 
better as you expect, I guess you already have a better case so please 
share it to avoid further discussion.

Thanks
Tiejun