From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@gmail.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Spurious verification mismatch?
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:15:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EBC75F.8070308@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140812045621.GA26083@sucs.org>
On 08/11/2014 10:56 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> (Resending with list cc)
>
> On 7 August 2014 22:27, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2014 09:22 AM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
>>> When trying to use fio from git
>>> ae7e055f755e77dfa71ae9040250ce8eec238721 (commit dated July 25th) the
>>> following line always fails at the same point:
>>>
>>> ./fio --randseed=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=1 --bs=64k
>>> --rw=randwrite --verify=meta --verify_backlog=50 --filename
>>> /dev/shm/foo --size=8M --time_based --runtime=1m --name=go
>>>
>>> Switching --loops=4 for --time_based --runtime=1m doesn't resulted in
>>> the same error.
>>>
>>> Is this fio job malformed?
>>
>> No, the job is fine, it's yet another case where the numberio
>> verification for meta fails miserably. Try current git, I committed a
>> one liner for it.
>
> Yup that fixes it. I've got one more mismatch query although with a
> different job file:
>
> fio --thread --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=128 --bs=64k
> --rw=randwrite --verify=xxhash --verify_backlog=50 --filename
> /dev/sdaw --name=go --time_based --runtime=2m --size=1M
>
> I've got a case where this generates verification error before the job
> completes. However on most of the other disks I have tried (virtual
> disks, RAM disks etc) this job runs without issues. Once again
> replacing --time_based --runtime with --loops makes the issue go
> aways. Further, switching the ioscheduler for this disk from cfq to
> noop also makes the problem go away (I've disabled merging by echoing
> 1 into nomerges)...
>
> Could it be this job submits different I/O to the same position in the
> same batch? If so isn't the result undefined? Why would using noop
> solve the issue?
It's most likely a bug that is timing dependent, which is why certain
changes to the IO path below fio will make a difference. I'll take a
look at this.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-05 15:22 Spurious verification mismatch? Sitsofe Wheeler
2014-08-07 21:27 ` Jens Axboe
2014-08-12 4:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2014-08-13 20:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-08-28 22:03 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2014-08-28 22:57 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53EBC75F.8070308@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sitsofe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.