From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sanjay Rao <srao@redhat.com>, Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:36:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ECF390.40403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140814161247.GA32715@redhat.com>
On 08/14/2014 12:12 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/14, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/14/2014 10:24 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 08/13, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @@ -862,11 +862,9 @@ void do_sys_times(struct tms *tms) {
>>>> cputime_t tgutime, tgstime, cutime, cstime;
>>>>
>>>> - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>>>> thread_group_cputime_adjusted(current, &tgutime, &tgstime);
>>>> cutime = current->signal->cutime; cstime =
>>>> current->signal->cstime; -
>>>> spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>>>
>>> Ah, wait, there is another problem afaics...
>>
>> Last night I worked on another problem with this code.
>>
>> After propagating the stats from a dying task to the signal struct,
>> we need to make sure that that task's stats are not counted twice.
>
> Heh indeed ;) Can't understand how I missed that.
>
>> This requires zeroing the stats under the write_seqlock, which was
>> easy enough to add.
>
> Or you can expand the scope of write_seqlock/write_sequnlock, so that
> __unhash_process in called from inside the critical section. This looks
> simpler at first glance.
The problem with that is that wait_task_zombie() calls
thread_group_cputime_adjusted() in that if() branch, and
that code ends up taking the seqlock for read...
However, in __exit_signal that approach should work.
> Hmm, wait, it seems there is yet another problem ;) Afaics, you also
> need to modify __exit_signal() so that ->sum_sched_runtime/etc are
> accounted unconditionally, even if the group leader exits.
>
> Probably this is not a big problem, and sys_times() or clock_gettime()
> do not care at all because they use current.
>
> But without this change thread_group_cputime(reaped_zombie) won't look
> at this task_struct at all, this can lead to non-monotonic result if
> it was previously called when this task was alive (non-reaped).
You mean this whole block needs to run regardless of whether
the group is dead?
task_cputime(tsk, &utime, &stime);
write_seqlock(&sig->stats_lock);
sig->utime += utime;
sig->stime += stime;
sig->gtime += task_gtime(tsk);
sig->min_flt += tsk->min_flt;
sig->maj_flt += tsk->maj_flt;
sig->nvcsw += tsk->nvcsw;
sig->nivcsw += tsk->nivcsw;
sig->inblock += task_io_get_inblock(tsk);
sig->oublock += task_io_get_oublock(tsk);
task_io_accounting_add(&sig->ioac, &tsk->ioac);
sig->sum_sched_runtime += tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime;
How does that square with wait_task_zombie reaping the
statistics of the whole group with thread_group_cputime_adjusted()
when the group leader is exiting?
Could that lead to things being double-counted?
Or do you mean ONLY ->sum_sched_runtime is unconditionally
accounted in __exit_signal(), because wait_task_zombie() seems
to be missing that one?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-14 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 18:25 [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-12 19:22 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 22:27 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 17:35 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:25 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:57 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 21:03 ` [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 0:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 1:57 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 13:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 2:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-15 14:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 22:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 13:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 5:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15 6:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15 9:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 17:25 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 18:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 15:37 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 16:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:36 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-08-14 18:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 19:03 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 19:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 2:14 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 14:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 21:03 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:40 ` [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 17:50 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 6:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-13 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 13:24 ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 14:09 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ECF390.40403@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fmayhar@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=srao@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.