From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:55:36 +0200
Subject: [Cocci] Clarification for array indexing style
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1408180530130.2548@hadrien>
References: <1408219616.2683.101.camel@joe-AO725>
 <1408222763.2683.107.camel@joe-AO725>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1408170510420.2599@hadrien>
 <1408280475.17489.4.camel@joe-AO725> <53F0D3CB.4000803@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1408292542.17489.11.camel@joe-AO725>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1408171241450.2520@hadrien> <53F1BB55.8080008@metafoo.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1408180446550.2548@hadrien> <53F1CDF3.5010105@metafoo.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1408180530130.2548@hadrien>
Message-ID: <53F1DBA8.5010005@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> How about then
>
> (
> e1 . at e2 f + x
> |
> e1 ->@e2 f + x
> )
>
> where e2 has pointer typw (or array type?)
>
> e2 on the . or -> will pick up the entire innermost enclosing expression.
>

Would such a semantic patch approach handle also longer reference chains?

Regards,
Markus