From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>,
gleb@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, monamagarwal123@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfd: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:06:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F21668.5090500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140818150129.GA14447@ada>
Il 18/08/2014 17:01, Andreea-Cristina Bernat ha scritto:
> The uses of "rcu_assign_pointer()" are NULLing out the pointers.
> According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
> "1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
> it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
> smaller overhead.
>
> The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
> @@
> @@
>
> - rcu_assign_pointer
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER
> (..., NULL)
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index 20c3af7..a49130f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static void irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct _irqfd *irqfd,
> struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e;
>
> if (irqfd->gsi >= irq_rt->nr_rt_entries) {
> - rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static void irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct _irqfd *irqfd,
> if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
> rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, e);
> else
> - rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
> * It is paired with synchronize_srcu done by caller
> * of that function.
> */
> - rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
> }
> }
>
Hi, this patch actually had been submitted already last March. It
slipped through the cracks. I'm now applying both of Monam Agarwal's
RCU_INIT_POINTER patches. Sorry. :)
Thanks,
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 15:01 [PATCH] eventfd: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER() Andreea-Cristina Bernat
2014-08-18 15:06 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F21668.5090500@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bernat.ada@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monamagarwal123@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.