From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Stopping ceph daemons during the upgrade Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:19:48 +0200 Message-ID: <53F21994.5000202@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LUBRelWcv1RNOVIIxsbnoRkOnFdPM4Wcu" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:33305 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751284AbaHRPTz (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:19:55 -0400 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CEE4209E for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:19:48 +0200 (CEST) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LUBRelWcv1RNOVIIxsbnoRkOnFdPM4Wcu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, To not confuse the ceph daemons during a package upgrade ( see http://tra= cker.ceph.com/issues/9153#note-13 for instance ), it would be better to s= top the ceph daemons while ceph is being upgraded. Does that sound reason= able ? Here is how it could be done for .deb packages : https://github.com/dacha= ry/ceph/commit/cf3a0e7bef25e5190f3cdb69e57cb6b868d806fa and there probabl= y is a way to do something similar with RPM packages.=20 Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --LUBRelWcv1RNOVIIxsbnoRkOnFdPM4Wcu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlPyGZQACgkQ8dLMyEl6F214xQCfVaJhKYyVLUW5TvxNw9AHLUk0 7GcAoL3HJ7YXBGiNGqwBD7MDGSGw2MEg =ZPPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LUBRelWcv1RNOVIIxsbnoRkOnFdPM4Wcu--