From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx15.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.20]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7JBqFEw003826 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:52:15 -0400 Received: from mail.fibbs.org (phineas.fibbs.org [109.234.106.32]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7JBqC02001677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:52:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fibbs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750B020042D for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.fibbs.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.fibbs.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id fQYQV3zkP17Q for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.115] (p50895A6F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.90.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.fibbs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A241520041F for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53F33A68.2050203@mglug.de> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:52:08 +0200 From: Oliver Rath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Szenario for lvmetad Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Hi list, does it make sense to use lvmetad in one pc with 4 disks, which are used for lvm? Are the metadata cached in a non-lvmetad environment? Tfh! Oliver