From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: Add vmmc and vqmmc supplies for Peach Pit and Pi boards Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:21:58 +0200 Message-ID: <53F476C6.9030809@collabora.co.uk> References: <1408460913-13863-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1408460913-13863-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <53F39978.3080901@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53F39978.3080901@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Mark Brown , Naveen Krishna Chatradhi , Rahul Sharma , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hello Andreas, Thanks a lot for your feedback. On 08/19/2014 08:37 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: >> &mmc_2 { >> + vmmc-supply =3D <&tps65090_fet4>; >> + vqmmc-supply =3D <&vqmmc_sdcard>; >> status =3D "okay"; >> num-slots =3D <1>; >> supports-highspeed; >=20 > A convention that I picked up was to place overridden status property > first. Do your new properties really need to go before that? > OF doesn't care about the order of the child nodes but I do agree that consistency is a good thing so I'll change that on v2. > Also, if you look at today's for-next, then supports-highspeed should= be > cap-{sd,mmc}-highspeed, so it may be worth to rebase. >=20 You are right, this patch used to be part of an older series so I didn'= t realize that "[PATCHv10 3/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecate the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc" was already merged. Thanks for the reminder! > Regards, > Andreas >=20 Best regards, Javier From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:21:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: Add vmmc and vqmmc supplies for Peach Pit and Pi boards In-Reply-To: <53F39978.3080901@suse.de> References: <1408460913-13863-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1408460913-13863-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <53F39978.3080901@suse.de> Message-ID: <53F476C6.9030809@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Andreas, Thanks a lot for your feedback. On 08/19/2014 08:37 PM, Andreas F?rber wrote: >> &mmc_2 { >> + vmmc-supply = <&tps65090_fet4>; >> + vqmmc-supply = <&vqmmc_sdcard>; >> status = "okay"; >> num-slots = <1>; >> supports-highspeed; > > A convention that I picked up was to place overridden status property > first. Do your new properties really need to go before that? > OF doesn't care about the order of the child nodes but I do agree that consistency is a good thing so I'll change that on v2. > Also, if you look at today's for-next, then supports-highspeed should be > cap-{sd,mmc}-highspeed, so it may be worth to rebase. > You are right, this patch used to be part of an older series so I didn't realize that "[PATCHv10 3/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecate the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc" was already merged. Thanks for the reminder! > Regards, > Andreas > Best regards, Javier