From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKBMT-00027J-Re for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:16:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKBMM-0002IW-CO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:15:57 -0400 Received: from mail-bn1blp0188.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.188]:52016 helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKBMM-0002IN-7Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:15:50 -0400 Message-ID: <53F4F336.1040101@amd.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:12:54 -0500 From: Joel Schopp MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1407594349-9291-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1407594349-9291-7-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1407594349-9291-7-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] hw/vfio: create common module List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Auger , eric.auger@st.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kim.phillips@freescale.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, Kim Phillips , will.deacon@arm.com, agraf@suse.de, stuart.yoder@freescale.com, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu > +int vfio_get_device(VFIOGroup *group, const char *name, > + VFIODevice *vbasedev) > +{ > + struct vfio_device_info dev_info = { .argsz = sizeof(dev_info) }; > + struct vfio_region_info reg_info = { .argsz = sizeof(reg_info) }; > + struct vfio_irq_info irq_info = { .argsz = sizeof(irq_info) }; > + int ret; > + > + ret = ioctl(group->fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, name); > + if (ret < 0) { Should be: if(ret) { instead of: if (ret < 0) { The ioctl can, and sometimes does, return positive values in case of errors. This should also be fixed in vfio_container_do_ioctl()