From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Valentine Sinitsyn <valentine.sinitsyn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Nested paging in nested SVM setup
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:16:47 +0600
Message-ID: <53F5D51F.2010900@gmail.com>
References: <53A179C4.9060203@gmail.com> <53A18A6D.2050407@siemens.com> <53F44440.6070408@gmail.com> <53F44645.2000708@redhat.com> <53F45036.1070309@gmail.com> <53F45832.5080708@redhat.com> <53F59192.3070500@gmail.com> <53F5B250.3000206@gmail.com> <53F5D251.60009@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43]:45574 "EHLO
	mail-la0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753955AbaHULQw (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:16:52 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id gi9so5855586lab.2
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F5D251.60009@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 21.08.2014 17:04, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I think it's just a bug.  Nobody thought that you'd let L2 access L1's
Sure, this is by no means a common use case. However can be seen as a 
flaw that lets the malicious guest to affects others by mapping and 
reprogramming APICs or other.

Valentine