All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Haxby <john.haxby@oracle.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: path watcher
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:31:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F7624C.2000903@oracle.com> (raw)

Hello,

We have an internal group auditing updates to files but who would like
to be able to monitor the actual modification rather than the possible
intent to modify.

The example they gave is that some program opens a file
O_WRONLY|O_APPEND but in most cases it does not subsequently write to
the file.  For them, the usual auditctl -p path -w wa causes lots of
false positives.

Historically, I know, that -w wa is triggered by the open(2) flags
rather than actual modifications because "[t]he read & write syscalls
are omitted from this set since they would overwhelm the logs."  Reading
this again now, it looks a little specious as it seems quite easy to
overwhelm the logs anyway.

Is there any reason why a file watcher should not use the fsnotify
FS_ACCESS/MODIFY/ATTRIB masks before I go haring off to try to implement
that?

jch

             reply	other threads:[~2014-08-22 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-22 15:31 John Haxby [this message]
2014-09-12 17:35 ` path watcher Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53F7624C.2000903@oracle.com \
    --to=john.haxby@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.