From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Some benchmark results
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:02:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FAFBA8.3050009@monom.org> (raw)
Hi,
I wanted to know how good or bad mainline vs RT is, therefore I let
MMTests torture my laptop for a while. I selected a few of the supported
benchmarks by MMTests in order to keep to a reasonable time frame.
The aim was to see the impact of normal (no RT) workloads with different
preempt configurations on mainline and RT patched kernel. I tried to not
to change other configuration flags except the preempt one. There are
some small difference due to dependencies but the rest looks ok to me.
http://www.monom.org/rt/mmtests/
Suggestion, improvements, comments?
cheers,
daniel
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-25 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-25 9:02 Daniel Wagner [this message]
2014-08-25 14:14 ` Some benchmark results Bernhard Schiffner
2014-08-28 6:11 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FAFBA8.3050009@monom.org \
--to=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.