From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
pekon <pekon@pek-sem.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP2+: fix gpmc_cs_remap: re-allocating chip-select address space based on DT
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:27:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FB1D95.8020405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406139458-11676-1-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com>
From: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
Each GPMC chip-select needs to be configured for (base-address,CS-size) so that
GPMC understands the address-space allocated to device connected externally.
These chip-select configurations (base-address, CS-size) follow some basic
mapping rules like:
- The CS size is programmable from 256 MBytes to 16 MBytes (must be a power of 2)
and is defined by the mask field. Attached memory smaller than the programmed
CS region size is accessed through the entire CS region (aliasing).
- The programmed 'base-address' must be aligned to the 'CS-size' boundary and
be a power of 2.
- Valid CS-size values are {256MB(max), 128MB, 64MB, 32MB and 16MB (min)}
Any intermediate values creates holes in the chip-select memory-map.
This patch adds above checks in gpmc_cs_remap() so that any invalid value
passed by DT <reg> property can be filtered before actually allocating the
address space.
[rogerq@ti.com] typo and print message fixes.
Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
index 8bc1338..793f3a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
@@ -516,31 +516,54 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
* gpmc_cs_remap - remaps a chip-select physical base address
* @cs: chip-select to remap
* @base: physical base address to re-map chip-select to
+ * @size: size of the chip select map
*
* Re-maps a chip-select to a new physical base address specified by
* "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
- * on failure.
+ * on failure. "size" of the map must be either 16M, 32M, 64M or 128M.
*/
-static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
+static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base, u32 size)
{
int ret;
- u32 old_base, size;
if (cs > gpmc_cs_num) {
pr_err("%s: requested chip-select is disabled\n", __func__);
return -ENODEV;
}
- /*
- * Make sure we ignore any device offsets from the GPMC partition
- * allocated for the chip select and that the new base confirms
- * to the GPMC 16MB minimum granularity.
- */
- base &= ~(SZ_16M - 1);
-
- gpmc_cs_get_memconf(cs, &old_base, &size);
- if (base == old_base)
- return 0;
+ /* Align size to meet SoC limitations */
+ if (size > SZ_256M) {
+ pr_err("%s: CS memory map > 256MB not supported\n", __func__);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ } else if (size > SZ_128M) {
+ WARN((size != SZ_256M), "%s: cs=%d: allocating 256MB\n",
+ __func__, cs);
+ size = SZ_256M;
+ } else if (size > SZ_64M) {
+ WARN((size != SZ_128M), "%s: cs=%d: allocating 128MB\n",
+ __func__, cs);
+ size = SZ_128M;
+ } else if (size > SZ_32M) {
+ WARN((size != SZ_64M), "%s: cs=%d: allocating 64MB\n",
+ __func__, cs);
+ size = SZ_64M;
+ } else if (size > SZ_16M) {
+ WARN((size != SZ_32M), "%s: cs=%d: allocating 32MB\n",
+ __func__, cs);
+ size = SZ_32M;
+ } else {
+ WARN((size != SZ_16M), "%s: cs=%d: allocating 16MB\n",
+ __func__, cs);
+ size = SZ_16M;
+ }
+
+ /* base address should be aligned with address-space size */
+ if (base & (size - 1)) {
+ pr_err("%s: cs base-addr: %x should be aligned to cs size: %x",
+ __func__, base, size);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
gpmc_cs_disable_mem(cs);
ret = gpmc_cs_delete_mem(cs);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -1551,7 +1574,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
* CS to this location. Once DT migration is complete should
* just make gpmc_cs_request() map a specific address.
*/
- ret = gpmc_cs_remap(cs, res.start);
+ ret = gpmc_cs_remap(cs, res.start, resource_size(&res));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot remap GPMC CS %d to %pa\n",
cs, &res.start);
--
1.8.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-25 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-23 18:17 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: fix gpmc_cs_remap: re-allocating chip-select address space based on DT Pekon Gupta
2014-08-01 11:00 ` Roger Quadros
2014-08-01 18:08 ` Pekon Gupta
2014-08-22 23:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-08-25 10:39 ` Roger Quadros
2014-08-25 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-08-25 18:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-08-25 11:27 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2014-08-25 18:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Tony Lindgren
2014-08-26 7:50 ` Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FB1D95.8020405@ti.com \
--to=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekon@pek-sem.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.