From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update pvSCSI protocol description Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:32:57 +0200 Message-ID: <53FB1EE9.9010800@suse.com> References: <1408943152-6244-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <53FB0B88020000780002D0D1@mail.emea.novell.com> <53FB1A68.1070904@suse.com> <53FB3865020000780002D1CA@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53FB3865020000780002D1CA@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, david.vrabel@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/25/2014 01:21 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 25.08.14 at 13:13, wrote: >> On 08/25/2014 10:10 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 25.08.14 at 07:05, <"jgross@suse.com".non-mime.internet> wrote: >>>> + * feature-sg-grant >>>> + * Values: >>> >>> Since when can XenStore encode fixed-width values? Same further >>> down - they're all plain (perhaps unsigned) integer values at this >>> layer. >> >> This documents the supported value range - I'd rather keep it. > > 64k grants? And even if indeed so, how would you express a > range constraint of 0...15 this way, or even one not starting at > zero? I think this should say " (valid range 0...LIMIT)" > or some such. Yes, that's better. Juergen