From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen Gang Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch: Kconfig: Let all architectures set endian explicitly Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:26:31 +0800 Message-ID: <53FB2B77.8070606@gmail.com> References: <53ECE9DD.80004@gmail.com> <20140814180418.GA20777@linux-mips.org> <53ED34CE.3040001@gmail.com> <53EDCC60.5040608@gmail.com> <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GQ5QHWpAfHOi1hi/YgRiyZDF/ALDEuRpuJ84ukra6RQ=; b=V+hgbNP2nsfJDrU4AXMNY7fQZtxVX5KK29Us+7dzpNhyHfivVktMG7PJC6cJyIppim nPzu9z5YatcwWJvfPb1iphd+TXld/aIMsbi0/WTMg/0mFeu9D8G3tp7P+XBYFHvhW3dE K9eJhA8h3K+0C5Fuhy2M/5jC2L/N4mwdZEGusMbP+qtOAxbz28JLKt9azOvXd2u75U+g 7BKqJo52CJPu5iDRbMOXAhi5C1b1JakiX2qAbJW0kQBgpqdKICHWPIQ/pqO12mP7fTA0 iwZWzLl8P0CqiFDH3zSFAMyKxTwDrmV4w0St89bZNTOU89EC/pM8TtY+ss8tcbudpM3S Hjdw== In-Reply-To: <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Arnd Bergmann , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, vgupta@synopsys.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Jean Delvare , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, egtvedt@samfundet.no, realmz6@gmail.com, msalter@redhat.com, a-jacquiot@ti.com, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, rkuo@codeaurora.org, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, takata@linux-m32r.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, Michal Simek , yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com, jonas@southpole.se, jejb@parisc-linux.org, deller@gmx.de, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, Mart Hello all: It seems no any additional rejections for it. I guess, I need split the 'big' patch into pieces, and each send to its' related mailing list, so let it not like a spam. And the schedule may like: - Firstly, send patch for "init/Kconfig" to add CPU_*_ENDIAN. If pass checking (hope it can be passed checking), then - Send each related patch to each related architectures which already knew their ENDIAN attributes in config time (24 patches, I guess), then - Make patch for Kbuild to support __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__, and pass checking (hope I can finish), then - Finish left architectures which need __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__ (4 patches, I guess). Welcome any ideas, suggestions, or completions. And if no additional reply, I shall not send any additional information any more to avoid spam to other members. Thanks. On 08/24/2014 04:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: > Hello Maintainers: > > Is this patch OK? If it pass basic checking, please let me know, and I > shall try to make another related patch for KBuild (I can do nothing > related with Kbuild, before get confirmation for this patch). > > Thanks. > > On 8/15/14 17:01, Chen Gang wrote: >> >> >> On 8/15/14 6:14, Chen Gang wrote: >>> On 08/15/2014 02:04 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: >>>> >>> >>> OK, thanks, I assumes when support both endian, the default choice is >>> CPU_BIG_ENDIAN, although no default value for choice (originally, I did >>> worry about it). >>> >>>> So I think you can just drop the MIPS segment from your patch. >>>> >>> >>> If what I assumes is correct, what you said sounds reasonable to me. >>> >>> >> >> So for me, it is harmless to add CPU_*_ENDIAN explicitly, and can let >> other members don't need think of. >> >> By the way, for sh, it is almost the same case, except it contents the >> default value, for me, it is clear enough, so I skip sh architecture in >> this patch. >> >> >> Thanks >> > -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen Gang Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:26:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch: Kconfig: Let all architectures set endian explicitly Message-Id: <53FB2B77.8070606@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <53ECE9DD.80004@gmail.com> <20140814180418.GA20777@linux-mips.org> <53ED34CE.3040001@gmail.com> <53EDCC60.5040608@gmail.com> <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Arnd Bergmann , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, vgupta@synopsys.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Jean Delvare , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, egtvedt@samfundet.no, realmz6@gmail.com, msalter@redhat.com, a-jacquiot@ti.com, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, rkuo@codeaurora.org, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, takata@linux-m32r.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, Michal Simek , yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com, jonas@southpole.se, jejb@parisc-linux.org, deller@gmx.de, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, Mart Hello all: It seems no any additional rejections for it. I guess, I need split the 'big' patch into pieces, and each send to its' related mailing list, so let it not like a spam. And the schedule may like: - Firstly, send patch for "init/Kconfig" to add CPU_*_ENDIAN. If pass checking (hope it can be passed checking), then - Send each related patch to each related architectures which already knew their ENDIAN attributes in config time (24 patches, I guess), then - Make patch for Kbuild to support __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__, and pass checking (hope I can finish), then - Finish left architectures which need __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__ (4 patches, I guess). Welcome any ideas, suggestions, or completions. And if no additional reply, I shall not send any additional information any more to avoid spam to other members. Thanks. On 08/24/2014 04:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: > Hello Maintainers: > > Is this patch OK? If it pass basic checking, please let me know, and I > shall try to make another related patch for KBuild (I can do nothing > related with Kbuild, before get confirmation for this patch). > > Thanks. > > On 8/15/14 17:01, Chen Gang wrote: >> >> >> On 8/15/14 6:14, Chen Gang wrote: >>> On 08/15/2014 02:04 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: >>>> >>> >>> OK, thanks, I assumes when support both endian, the default choice is >>> CPU_BIG_ENDIAN, although no default value for choice (originally, I did >>> worry about it). >>> >>>> So I think you can just drop the MIPS segment from your patch. >>>> >>> >>> If what I assumes is correct, what you said sounds reasonable to me. >>> >>> >> >> So for me, it is harmless to add CPU_*_ENDIAN explicitly, and can let >> other members don't need think of. >> >> By the way, for sh, it is almost the same case, except it contents the >> default value, for me, it is clear enough, so I skip sh architecture in >> this patch. >> >> >> Thanks >> > -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:27:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45]:32839 "EHLO mail-pa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27006709AbaHYM1M6HTlP (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:27:12 +0200 Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id eu11so20953756pac.4 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 05:27:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GQ5QHWpAfHOi1hi/YgRiyZDF/ALDEuRpuJ84ukra6RQ=; b=V+hgbNP2nsfJDrU4AXMNY7fQZtxVX5KK29Us+7dzpNhyHfivVktMG7PJC6cJyIppim nPzu9z5YatcwWJvfPb1iphd+TXld/aIMsbi0/WTMg/0mFeu9D8G3tp7P+XBYFHvhW3dE K9eJhA8h3K+0C5Fuhy2M/5jC2L/N4mwdZEGusMbP+qtOAxbz28JLKt9azOvXd2u75U+g 7BKqJo52CJPu5iDRbMOXAhi5C1b1JakiX2qAbJW0kQBgpqdKICHWPIQ/pqO12mP7fTA0 iwZWzLl8P0CqiFDH3zSFAMyKxTwDrmV4w0St89bZNTOU89EC/pM8TtY+ss8tcbudpM3S Hjdw== X-Received: by 10.68.196.226 with SMTP id ip2mr11022838pbc.120.1408969626086; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 05:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.23] ([124.127.118.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qj1sm37362465pbb.24.2014.08.25.05.26.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 05:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53FB2B77.8070606@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:26:31 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: Arnd Bergmann , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, vgupta@synopsys.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Jean Delvare , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, egtvedt@samfundet.no, realmz6@gmail.com, msalter@redhat.com, a-jacquiot@ti.com, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, rkuo@codeaurora.org, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, takata@linux-m32r.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, Michal Simek , yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com, jonas@southpole.se, jejb@parisc-linux.org, deller@gmx.de, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, Martin Schwidefsky , heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, Liqin Chen , Lennox Wu , "David S. Miller" , cmetcalf@tilera.com, jdike@addtoit.com, Richard Weinberger , gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, chris@zankel.net, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, linux390@de.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-cris-kernel@axis.com, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux@openrisc.net, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch: Kconfig: Let all architectures set endian explicitly References: <53ECE9DD.80004@gmail.com> <20140814180418.GA20777@linux-mips.org> <53ED34CE.3040001@gmail.com> <53EDCC60.5040608@gmail.com> <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 42219 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Hello all: It seems no any additional rejections for it. I guess, I need split the 'big' patch into pieces, and each send to its' related mailing list, so let it not like a spam. And the schedule may like: - Firstly, send patch for "init/Kconfig" to add CPU_*_ENDIAN. If pass checking (hope it can be passed checking), then - Send each related patch to each related architectures which already knew their ENDIAN attributes in config time (24 patches, I guess), then - Make patch for Kbuild to support __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__, and pass checking (hope I can finish), then - Finish left architectures which need __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__ (4 patches, I guess). Welcome any ideas, suggestions, or completions. And if no additional reply, I shall not send any additional information any more to avoid spam to other members. Thanks. On 08/24/2014 04:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: > Hello Maintainers: > > Is this patch OK? If it pass basic checking, please let me know, and I > shall try to make another related patch for KBuild (I can do nothing > related with Kbuild, before get confirmation for this patch). > > Thanks. > > On 8/15/14 17:01, Chen Gang wrote: >> >> >> On 8/15/14 6:14, Chen Gang wrote: >>> On 08/15/2014 02:04 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: >>>> >>> >>> OK, thanks, I assumes when support both endian, the default choice is >>> CPU_BIG_ENDIAN, although no default value for choice (originally, I did >>> worry about it). >>> >>>> So I think you can just drop the MIPS segment from your patch. >>>> >>> >>> If what I assumes is correct, what you said sounds reasonable to me. >>> >>> >> >> So for me, it is harmless to add CPU_*_ENDIAN explicitly, and can let >> other members don't need think of. >> >> By the way, for sh, it is almost the same case, except it contents the >> default value, for me, it is clear enough, so I skip sh architecture in >> this patch. >> >> >> Thanks >> > -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC8FD1A0006 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:27:13 +1000 (EST) Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id v10so20144021pde.11 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 05:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53FB2B77.8070606@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:26:31 +0800 From: Chen Gang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch: Kconfig: Let all architectures set endian explicitly References: <53ECE9DD.80004@gmail.com> <20140814180418.GA20777@linux-mips.org> <53ED34CE.3040001@gmail.com> <53EDCC60.5040608@gmail.com> <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53F9A48F.3020803@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Cc: linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, a-jacquiot@ti.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux@openrisc.net, will.deacon@arm.com, dhowells@redhat.com, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn, Jean Delvare , egtvedt@samfundet.no, jonas@southpole.se, Liqin Chen , jesper.nilsson@axis.com, linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, takata@linux-m32r.org, x86@kernel.org, jejb@parisc-linux.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Lennox Wu , msalter@redhat.com, mattst88@gmail.com, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, james.hogan@imgtec.com, Arnd Bergmann , realmz6@gmail.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cmetcalf@tilera.com, starvik@axis.com, linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net, chris@zankel.net, Michal Simek , tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@axis.com, vgupta@synopsys.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , rkuo@codeaurora.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Richard Weinberger , Martin Schwidefsky , linux390@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, deller@gmx.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello all: It seems no any additional rejections for it. I guess, I need split the 'big' patch into pieces, and each send to its' related mailing list, so let it not like a spam. And the schedule may like: - Firstly, send patch for "init/Kconfig" to add CPU_*_ENDIAN. If pass checking (hope it can be passed checking), then - Send each related patch to each related architectures which already knew their ENDIAN attributes in config time (24 patches, I guess), then - Make patch for Kbuild to support __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__, and pass checking (hope I can finish), then - Finish left architectures which need __BUILDING_TIME_BIG_ENDIAN__ (4 patches, I guess). Welcome any ideas, suggestions, or completions. And if no additional reply, I shall not send any additional information any more to avoid spam to other members. Thanks. On 08/24/2014 04:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote: > Hello Maintainers: > > Is this patch OK? If it pass basic checking, please let me know, and I > shall try to make another related patch for KBuild (I can do nothing > related with Kbuild, before get confirmation for this patch). > > Thanks. > > On 8/15/14 17:01, Chen Gang wrote: >> >> >> On 8/15/14 6:14, Chen Gang wrote: >>> On 08/15/2014 02:04 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: >>>> >>> >>> OK, thanks, I assumes when support both endian, the default choice is >>> CPU_BIG_ENDIAN, although no default value for choice (originally, I did >>> worry about it). >>> >>>> So I think you can just drop the MIPS segment from your patch. >>>> >>> >>> If what I assumes is correct, what you said sounds reasonable to me. >>> >>> >> >> So for me, it is harmless to add CPU_*_ENDIAN explicitly, and can let >> other members don't need think of. >> >> By the way, for sh, it is almost the same case, except it contents the >> default value, for me, it is clear enough, so I skip sh architecture in >> this patch. >> >> >> Thanks >> > -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed