All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: remove full /dev scanning
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:52:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FC58E4.4050600@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F51F4D.2090203@redhat.com>



  Apparently we don't need -d option at all. The libblkid does
  cover both udev and /proc/partitions.

  ----
  EVALUATE=<methods>
    Defines LABEL and UUID evaluation method(s). Currently, the libblkid 
library supports "udev" and "scan" methods. More than one methods may be 
specified in a comma separated list. Default is "udev,scan". The "udev" 
method uses udev /dev/disk/by-* symlinks and the "scan" method scans all 
block devices from the /proc/partitions file.
  ----

  We could mark -d option as deprecated (in btrfs dev scan and
  btrfs fi show) or if agreed I would prefer totally removal.
  That will clean up the code quite nicely.

Thanks, Anand


On 21/08/2014 06:21, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> btrfs fileystem show and btrfs device scan today both have
> the "-d" option to scan everything under /dev.  But we also
> have a mechanism to scan everything in /proc/partitions, which
> should always be sufficient.
>
> If anyone knows why we'd find something deep under /dev but
> not in /proc/partitions, speak now or forever hold your peace...
>
> Tested this by running through a matrix of -d, -m, or "" args
> for show/scan, for a 2-device fs, with and without a symlinked
> device, with and without a symlinked mountpoint.  All output was
> identical.
>
> Thanks,
> -Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-26  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-20 22:21 [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: remove full /dev scanning Eric Sandeen
2014-08-20 22:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: scan /proc/partitions not all of /dev with "-d" Eric Sandeen
2014-08-26  8:27   ` Anand Jain
2014-08-20 22:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: don't fall back to recursive /dev scan Eric Sandeen
2014-08-26  8:27   ` Anand Jain
2014-08-20 22:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: remove BTRFS_SCAN_DEV and btrfs_scan_one_dir Eric Sandeen
2014-08-26  8:29   ` Anand Jain
2014-08-21  8:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] btrfs-progs: remove full /dev scanning Anand Jain
2014-08-21 14:29   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-08-26  8:24     ` Anand Jain
2014-08-26 11:08     ` David Sterba
2014-08-21 18:08 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-08-26 10:55   ` David Sterba
2014-08-26 14:51     ` Eric Sandeen
2014-08-26 14:53       ` Chris Mason
2014-08-26 22:56         ` Anand Jain
2014-08-26  9:52 ` Anand Jain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FC58E4.4050600@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.