From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 0/5] Add XEN pvSCSI support Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:13:15 +0100 Message-ID: <53FC5DBB.9080101@citrix.com> References: <1408354310-6362-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1408742515.24496.21.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> <20140823004042.GA5547@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:18983 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934467AbaHZKNT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 06:13:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140823004042.GA5547@laptop.dumpdata.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: jgross@suse.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, JBottomley@parallels.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, hch@infradead.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, JBeulich@suse.com On 23/08/14 01:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:21:55PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >> >> >> For the XEN scsiback parts as a new target fabric driver, feel free to >> add my: >> >> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Bellinger >> >> So I assume this will be merged for v3.18 via the xen.git tree, yes..? My preference is for drivers outside of drivers/xen/ to be merged via their relevant subsystem tree. This is how all the other Xen PV drivers are handled (net, block, console, etc.). > > When I chatted with Christopher Hellwig he recommended it be done that way. Did he give a reason? The driver has more scsi bits in it than Xen bits really. David