From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] regmap: cache: Fix regcache_sync_block for non-autoincrementing devices
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:52:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FD7210.606@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hk35vpc18.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
On 08/26/2014 05:21 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:03:12 +0300,
> Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>> Commit 75a5f89f635c ("regmap: cache: Write consecutive registers in a single
>> block write") expected that autoincrementing writes are supported if
>> hardware has a register format which can support raw writes.
>>
>> This is not necessarily true and thus for instance rbtree sync can fail when
>> there is need to sync multiple consecutive registers but block write to
>> device fails due not supported autoincrementing writes.
>>
>> Fix this by spliting raw block sync to series of single register writes for
>> devices that don't support autoincrementing writes.
> Wouldn't it suffice to correct regmap_can_raw_write() to return false
> if map->use_single_rw is set?
>
I don't know. I was thinking that also but was unsure about it since
regcache_sync_block_raw() and regcache_sync_block_single() code paths
use different regmap write functions. regcache_sync_block_raw() ends up
calling _regmap_raw_write() which takes care of page select operation
when needed and regcache_sync_block_single() uses _regmap_write() which
doesn't.
Which makes me thinking should the regcache_sync_block_single() also use
_regmap_raw_write() in order to take care of page selects?
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 14:03 [PATCH 0/2] ASoC/regmap: rt5640: Fix resume Jarkko Nikula
2014-08-26 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] regmap: cache: Fix regcache_sync_block for non-autoincrementing devices Jarkko Nikula
2014-08-26 14:21 ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2014-08-27 5:52 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2014-08-27 8:18 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-27 11:58 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-26 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: rt5640: Do not allow regmap to use bulk read-write operations Jarkko Nikula
2014-08-27 12:00 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53FD7210.606@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.