From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Caesar Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: document Rockchip thermal Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 04:36:35 +0800 Message-ID: <53FE4153.3080601@rock-chips.com> References: <1409096503-7081-1-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> <1409096503-7081-3-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> <5911166.ElkaNhDZrP@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5911166.ElkaNhDZrP@wuerfel> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: heiko@sntech.de, rui.zhang@intel.com, edubezval@gmail.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com, cf@rock-chips.com, dianders@chromium.org, dtor@chromium.org, zyw@rock-chips.com, addy.ke@rock-chips.com, zhaoyifeng List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Arnd, =E5=9C=A8 2014=E5=B9=B408=E6=9C=8828=E6=97=A5 04:17, Arnd Bergmann =E5=86= =99=E9=81=93: > On Wednesday 27 August 2014 07:41:43 Caesar Wang wrote: >> +- clock-names : Shall be "tsadc_clk" for the transfer-clock, and "t= sadc_pclk" for >> + the peripheral clock. >> > Why not just name them "clk" and "pclk"? The "tsadc" part seems highl= y redundant. > > Alternatively, how about "transfer" and "peripheral"? It seems nappropriate description. But,I will fix as the following: -clock-names =EF=BC=9A Shall be "tsadc" for the converter-clock, and "a= pb_pclk" for the peripheral clock. Thanks! > > Arnd > > > --=20 Best regards, Caesar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: caesar.wang@rock-chips.com (Caesar Wang) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 04:36:35 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: document Rockchip thermal In-Reply-To: <5911166.ElkaNhDZrP@wuerfel> References: <1409096503-7081-1-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> <1409096503-7081-3-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> <5911166.ElkaNhDZrP@wuerfel> Message-ID: <53FE4153.3080601@rock-chips.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Arnd, ? 2014?08?28? 04:17, Arnd Bergmann ??: > On Wednesday 27 August 2014 07:41:43 Caesar Wang wrote: >> +- clock-names : Shall be "tsadc_clk" for the transfer-clock, and "tsadc_pclk" for >> + the peripheral clock. >> > Why not just name them "clk" and "pclk"? The "tsadc" part seems highly redundant. > > Alternatively, how about "transfer" and "peripheral"? It seems nappropriate description. But,I will fix as the following: -clock-names ? Shall be "tsadc" for the converter-clock, and "apb_pclk" for the peripheral clock. Thanks! > > Arnd > > > -- Best regards, Caesar