From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris J Arges Subject: Re: kvm-unit-test failures Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:18:38 -0500 Message-ID: <5400EE2E.1000408@canonical.com> References: <53FDDD3F.8050102@redhat.com> <1409150751-22763-1-git-send-email-chris.j.arges@canonical.com> <53FDF09F.4060007@redhat.com> <53FE4C7E.90201@canonical.com> <1018860798.37183509.1409177149937.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <5400BA22.9080704@canonical.com> <5400EBD9.6070204@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:58636 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750788AbaH2VSm (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:18:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5400EBD9.6070204@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/29/2014 04:08 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 29/08/2014 19:36, Chris J Arges ha scritto: >> I still get failures with the following test, I actually tested on >> multiple machines with identical hardware and the same failure occurred. >> In v3.13/v3.16 series kernels this passes. I'll look into which commit >> changed this result for me. I suspect it was fairly recent. > > I would try bisecting between 0e5ac3a8b100469ea154f87dd57b685fbdd356f6 > (might be bad) and 41fa4215f8e8150bdc5d2a5f8704915f1b059fa8 (might be good). > Just sent the other email with my bisect results, the 'bad' commit for me is: 0d3da0d26e3c3515997c99451ce3b0ad1a69a36c A revert on this commit allows the tests to pass again. > Is this a laptop or desktop? Any relationship between the "Offset" and > how long the machine has been up? > > Paolo > This is a server; and no, I've reboot the machine and re-run the test. I've also run it after days of uptime. --chris