From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: kvm-unit-test failures Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:05:01 +0200 Message-ID: <540347AD.20308@redhat.com> References: <53FDDD3F.8050102@redhat.com> <1409150751-22763-1-git-send-email-chris.j.arges@canonical.com> <53FDF09F.4060007@redhat.com> <53FE4C7E.90201@canonical.com> <1018860798.37183509.1409177149937.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <5400BA22.9080704@canonical.com> <5400EB01.1080106@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Chris J Arges Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:49977 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751173AbaHaQFF (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 12:05:05 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id cc10so4436353wib.6 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:05:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5400EB01.1080106@canonical.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 29/08/2014 23:05, Chris J Arges ha scritto: > And indeed there is a condition where matched && already_matched are > both true. In this case we don't zero or increment nr_vcpus_matched_tsc. > Incrementing nr_vcpus_matched_tsc in that last else clause allows the > test to pass; however this is identical to the logic before the patch. Can you please trace the test using trace-cmd (http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing) and send the output? Paolo