From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.co.uk>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] videobuf: Allow reqbufs(0) to free current buffers
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:36:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54049268.3060004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540474AE.4070706@xs4all.nl>
Hi,
On 09/01/2014 03:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> At first glance this looks fine. But making changes in videobuf is always scary :-)
> so I hope Marek can look at this as well.
>
> How well was this tested?
I ran some tests on bttv which all ran well.
Note that the code already allowed for going from say 4 buffers to 1,
and the old code path for reqbufs was already calling __videobuf_free()
before re-allocating the buffers again. So in essence this just changes
things to allow the 4 buffers to 1 case to also be 4 buffers to 0.
Regards,
Hans
>
> I'll try do test this as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> On 08/31/2014 12:19 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> All the infrastructure for this is already there, and despite our desires for
>> the old videobuf code to go away, it is currently still in use in 18 drivers.
>>
>> Allowing reqbufs(0) makes these drivers behave consistent with modern drivers,
>> making live easier for userspace, see e.g. :
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735660
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c
>> index fb5ee5d..b91a266 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-core.c
>> @@ -441,11 +441,6 @@ int videobuf_reqbufs(struct videobuf_queue *q,
>> unsigned int size, count;
>> int retval;
>>
>> - if (req->count < 1) {
>> - dprintk(1, "reqbufs: count invalid (%d)\n", req->count);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> if (req->memory != V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP &&
>> req->memory != V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR &&
>> req->memory != V4L2_MEMORY_OVERLAY) {
>> @@ -471,6 +466,12 @@ int videobuf_reqbufs(struct videobuf_queue *q,
>> goto done;
>> }
>>
>> + if (req->count == 0) {
>> + dprintk(1, "reqbufs: count invalid (%d)\n", req->count);
>> + retval = __videobuf_free(q);
>> + goto done;
>> + }
>> +
>> count = req->count;
>> if (count > VIDEO_MAX_FRAME)
>> count = VIDEO_MAX_FRAME;
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-01 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-31 10:19 [PATCH] videobuf: Allow reqbufs(0) to free current buffers Hans de Goede
2014-09-01 13:29 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-09-01 15:36 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2014-09-02 7:36 ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-02 7:41 ` Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54049268.3060004@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.