diff for duplicates of <5406B396.30907@renesas.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 95934a5..2536095 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -29,15 +29,15 @@ On 9/3/2014 2:48 PM, Simon Horman wrote: >>> which I followed up on, however that change no longer seems appropriate. >>> This this patch seems to be correct. >> [...] ->>> - memory@180000000 { ->>> + memory@140000000 { +>>> - memory at 180000000 { +>>> + memory at 140000000 { >> >> Could you give more information about not using new syntax ? >> >> I checked memblock information in both 2 ways ->> (i.e memory@140000000 and memory@1,40000000) +>> (i.e memory at 140000000 and memory at 1,40000000) >> and I got same result. ->> root@lager:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory +>> root at lager:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory >> 0: 0x0000000040000000..0x000000007fffffff >> 1: 0x0000000140000000..0x00000001ffffffff >> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ On 9/3/2014 2:48 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > drop the series you had. :)" > > An archive of the message in question is available at: -> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg36123.html +> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg36123.html OK. I understood. Let's follow the right way. :) diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ca35faa..aa9ef38 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ "ref\020140903004901.GA3277@verge.net.au\0" "ref\054068031.5050806@renesas.com\0" "ref\020140903054843.GA29259@verge.net.au\0" - "From\0Khiem Nguyen <khiem.nguyen.xt@renesas.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH repost] ARM: shmobile: lager: correct memory map\0" - "Date\0Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:22:14 +0000\0" + "From\0khiem.nguyen.xt@renesas.com (Khiem Nguyen)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH repost] ARM: shmobile: lager: correct memory map\0" + "Date\0Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:22:14 +0900\0" "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" @@ -38,15 +38,15 @@ ">>> which I followed up on, however that change no longer seems appropriate.\n" ">>> This this patch seems to be correct.\n" ">> [...]\n" - ">>> -\tmemory@180000000 {\n" - ">>> +\tmemory@140000000 {\n" + ">>> -\tmemory at 180000000 {\n" + ">>> +\tmemory at 140000000 {\n" ">>\n" ">> Could you give more information about not using new syntax ?\n" ">>\n" ">> I checked memblock information in both 2 ways \n" - ">> (i.e memory@140000000 and memory@1,40000000)\n" + ">> (i.e memory at 140000000 and memory at 1,40000000)\n" ">> and I got same result.\n" - ">> root@lager:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory\n" + ">> root at lager:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/memory\n" ">> 0: 0x0000000040000000..0x000000007fffffff\n" ">> 1: 0x0000000140000000..0x00000001ffffffff\n" ">>\n" @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ "> \t drop the series you had. :)\"\n" "> \n" "> An archive of the message in question is available at:\n" - "> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg36123.html\n" + "> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg36123.html\n" "\n" "OK. I understood.\n" "Let's follow the right way. :)\n" @@ -84,4 +84,4 @@ "Best regards,\n" KHIEM Nguyen -1067b0b62568e221b153e0934d21170f8aa926a47cde474245989e4d0d4fdea1 +b7b1dc4e51a2ee9143a95a2a1576e91ca67d58de1dc3c754012c2525e8947bab
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.