From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v6][PATCH 2/2] xen:vtd: missing RMRR mapping while
	share EPT
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:41:15 +0800
Message-ID: <5406E23B.9020806@intel.com>
References: <1406684186-12788-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<1406684186-12788-2-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<53D8CAC402000078000278E9@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<53D8B408.1010409@intel.com>
	<53D8D5A0020000780002792A@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<53D8BD70.7040905@intel.com>
	<53D8E4370200007800027986@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<53D8CB80.1000606@intel.com>
	<53D8E95A02000078000279BD@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<53DA103B.4000308@intel.com>
	<53DB552C020000780002846D@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<53DB3D57.5010107@intel.com>
	<53DB5C3002000078000284A4@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<53DB62EA.4090502@intel.com>
	<53DBB691020000780002875B@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<53DDED01.7000607@intel.com>
	<53DF53070200007800028CF1@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <53DF53070200007800028CF1@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: yang.z.zhang@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>
>> Additionally, I want to know if patch v6 is fine to be acked.
>
> My position hasn't changed: I view this as correct but incomplete,
> and hence not ready for inclusion. With - iirc - Tim being of a
> different opinion, if you want to push for a decision without
> supplying the missing pieces, see the section "Conflict Resolution"
> on http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html. But of course
> I'd much prefer to avoid having to fall back to this, and instead
> have a complete patch set to commit within reasonable time.
>
> Jan

Looks I can't make my RFC patches to implement a complete RMRR 
supporting better as you pointed while reviewing, so I have to go back 
looking at this.

So how can I issue such a private vote on these two patches? I don't see 
How-to in the section "Conflict Resolution" on 
http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html.

Thanks
Tiejun